| What SEO can learn us |
|
The notion that content is king is a myth, because it's based on a fallacy, namely the following: If that would be true, marketing wouldn't be necessary. Content is important, but it's not everything. Some people believe the consumer is king while others believe that the media is the most important aspect. I disagree, and I think we can learn a lot from the way Google ranks it's search results, and the way it works is this: The algorithm is pretty complex I reckon (and secret) but in simple words, the more mentions a website gets, the higher it'll be listed in the search result. It's very democratic when you think about it, and it has little to do with the quality of the content, but everything to do whether people think it's worth sharing. That's the way you find content on Google. So I reckon there's a lot to learn from the way Google priorities search results, as it's metaphorical to the way we receive content. Let's analyse. There are many systems on which to catagorize SEO but I've choose these three basic components: Content Audience Technical means So now let's apply those three things on this photo of a man who is King, unlike content.
Content Audience Technical means
Now, I believe these three key elements are equally essential. Would you take away King, then there would be no message. Without an audience, nobody would hear him and without the means nobody could hear him. I can't target anything specific to be the new king - and I won't. What's essential though is the mix of elements. That's how we get noticed, whether it be on Google or anywhere else. Further reading: |


Comments
RSS feed for comments to this post